google
yahoo
bing

in-the-wallet

Experian v. Lifelock Ruling

  • Posted on May 29th, 2009
  • |
  • In The Wallet
Cialis Soft Tabs For Sale Proscar No Prescription Buy Femara No Prescription Buy Online Triphala Buy Cafergot Online Evista For Sale Levaquin No Prescription Buy Augmentin No Prescription Buy Online Zyrtec Buy Glucotrol Online Nexium For Sale Bactroban No Prescription Buy Aristocort No Prescription Buy Online Ultram Buy Cyklokapron Online Cialis Soft For Sale Miacalcin No Prescription Buy Feldene No Prescription Buy Online Zerit Buy Viagra Soft Online Dilantin For Sale Lanoxin No Prescription Buy Elimite No Prescription Buy Online Calan Buy Lozol Online

Last week, a US Federal Judge ruled in the case Experian Information Solutions, Inc. v. Lifelock, Inc. that the intent of provisions in the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA), which gives consumers the right to place a free fraud alert on their credit files if they believe they are a victim of identity theft, did not include for consumers to be able to contract with businesses to file these alerts.
The ruling will not impact the way Europ Assistance USA (EA) serves its customers.   EA focuses on a multiple-pronged approach to identity prevention and fraud resolution.  The fraud alert is one piece of an often complicated puzzle to help victims prevent additional identity fraud from occurring.   Consumers should be wary of relying on fraud alerts as a proactive identity theft prevention strategy.  For more on what fraud alerts can and cannot do, read our post Fact and Myth on Fraud Alerts.

This entry was posted on Friday, May 29th, 2009 at 2:59 pm and is filed under In The Wallet.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

No Comments

Fill out the form to be the first to respond to this article!